SOC 성능 사다리
벤치마크 점수 순으로 정렬한 프로세서 성능 사다리
FP32 (float)
상대 성능
1
Mediatek Dimensity 9300
5,990
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
5,990
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
5,376
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
4,730
5
Apple M4 iPad
4,090
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
3,993
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
3,686
8
Apple M3 iPad
3,502
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3,481
10
Samsung Exynos 2400e
3,406
11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 4
3,379
12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
3,379
13
Apple M2 iPad
2,918
14
Apple M1 iPad
2,617
15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2,512
16
Apple A19 Pro
2,488
17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
2,457
18
Google Tensor G3
2,415
19
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
2,331
20
MediaTek Dimensity 8450
2,329
21
Apple A18 Pro
2,289
22
Google Tensor
2,170
23
Apple A17 Pro
2,147
24
Apple A18
1,907
25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
1,853
26
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
1,791
27
Apple A16 Bionic
1,789
28
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
1,781
29
HiSilicon Kirin 8020
1,720
30
Apple A15 Bionic
1,712
31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
1,689
32
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
1,632
33
Google Tensor G5
1,536
34
Samsung Exynos 2100
1,530
35
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
1,459
36
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1,442
37
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
1,372
38
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
1,372
39
MediaTek Dimensity 7350
1,332
40
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
1,309
41
Google Tensor G2
1,142
42
Samsung Exynos 990
1,126
43
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
1,036
44
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
1,036
45
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
979
46
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
979
47
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
898
48
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
844
49
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
752
50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
752
51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
727
52
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
691
53
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
691
54
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
686
55
MediaTek Dimensity 1080
686
56
MediaTek Dimensity 920
684
57
Apple A14 Bionic
654
58
HiSilicon Kirin 820
652
59
Samsung Exynos 9825
651
60
Apple A13 Bionic
629