SOC 성능 사다리

벤치마크 점수 순으로 정렬한 프로세서 성능 사다리

FP32 (float)

상대 성능
1 Mediatek Dimensity 9300 5,990 2 MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus 5,990 3 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 5,376 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 4,730 5 Apple M4 iPad 4,090 6 MediaTek Dimensity 9400e 3,993 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 3,686 8 Apple M3 iPad 3,502 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 3,481 10 Samsung Exynos 2400e 3,406 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 4 3,379 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 3,379 13 Apple M2 iPad 2,918 14 Apple M1 iPad 2,617 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 2,512 16 Apple A19 Pro 2,488 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 2,457 18 Google Tensor G3 2,415 19 HiSilicon Kirin 9000 2,331 20 MediaTek Dimensity 8450 2,329 21 Apple A18 Pro 2,289 22 Google Tensor 2,170 23 Apple A17 Pro 2,147 24 Apple A18 1,907 25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 1,853 26 MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus 1,791 27 Apple A16 Bionic 1,789 28 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 1,781 29 HiSilicon Kirin 8020 1,720 30 Apple A15 Bionic 1,712 31 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 1,689 32 MediaTek Dimensity 9000 1,632 33 Google Tensor G5 1,536 34 Samsung Exynos 2100 1,530 35 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 1,459 36 MediaTek Dimensity 8200 1,442 37 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus 1,372 38 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 1,372 39 MediaTek Dimensity 7350 1,332 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8100 1,309 41 Google Tensor G2 1,142 42 Samsung Exynos 990 1,126 43 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 1,036 44 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus 1,036 45 MediaTek Dimensity 1100 979 46 MediaTek Dimensity 8050 979 47 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 898 48 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus 844 49 Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G 752 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 752 51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 727 52 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G 691 53 HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G 691 54 MediaTek Dimensity 7050 686 55 MediaTek Dimensity 1080 686 56 MediaTek Dimensity 920 684 57 Apple A14 Bionic 654 58 HiSilicon Kirin 820 652 59 Samsung Exynos 9825 651 60 Apple A13 Bionic 629