Product Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
NVIDIAGPU
NVIDIAGPU
Verdict
PerformanceNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile leads in 2 of 2 benchmarks
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Δ
3DMark Time Spy
5,597
2,072
+170%
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
2,574
941
+174%
Specifications
Specs Compare| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Graphics Card | ||
| Release Date | Apr 2019 | Jul 2014 |
| Generation | GeForce 16 Mobile | Quadro |
| Type | Mobile | Professional |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Clock Speeds | ||
| Base Clock | 1455 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Memory Clock | 1500 MHz | 1502 MHz |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Size | 6GB | 8GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | 192bit | 256bit |
| Bandwidth | 288.0GB/s | 192.3GB/s |
| Render Config | ||
| SM Count | 24 | |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2304 |
| TMUs | 96 | 192 |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per SM) | |
| L2 Cache | 1536 KB | |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| Pixel Rate | 76.32 GPixel/s | 37.01 GPixel/s |
| Texture Rate | 152.6 GTexel/s | 148.0 GTexel/s |
| FP16 (half) | 9.769 TFLOPS | |
| FP32 (float) | 4.884 TFLOPS | 3.553 TFLOPS |
| FP64 (double) | 152.6 GFLOPS | 148.0 GFLOPS |
| Graphics Processor | ||
| GPU Name | TU116 | GK110B |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process Size | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 6.6 billion | 7.08 billion |
| Die Size | 284 mm² | 561 mm² |
| Board Design | ||
| TDP | Unknown | 150W |
| Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI2x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Power Connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Suggested PSU | 450 W | |
| Graphics Features | ||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 3.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 5.1 |
Performance
Benchmarks3DMark Time Spy
5597
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
2574
941
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro K5200