Product Compare
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB
| GPU | GPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Graphics Card | ||
| Release Date | Aug 2018 | Nov 2024 |
| Generation | Quadro | Server Hopper |
| Type | Professional | AI GPU |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Clock Speeds | ||
| Base Clock | 1395 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 1980 MHz |
| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz | 1593 MHz |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Size | 48GB | 141GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM3e |
| Memory Bus | 384bit | 6144bit |
| Bandwidth | 672.0GB/s | 4.89TB/s |
| Render Config | ||
| SM Count | 72 | 132 |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 16896 |
| TMUs | 288 | 528 |
| ROPs | 96 | 24 |
| Tensor Cores | 576 | 528 |
| RT Cores | 72 | |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per SM) | 256 KB (per SM) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 50 MB |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| Pixel Rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 47.52 GPixel/s |
| Texture Rate | 509.8 GTexel/s | 1045.4 GTexel/s |
| FP16 (half) | 32.62 TFLOPS | 267.6 TFLOPS |
| FP32 (float) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 66.91 TFLOPS |
| FP64 (double) | 509.8 GFLOPS | 33.45 TFLOPS |
| Graphics Processor | ||
| GPU Name | TU102 | GH100 |
| GPU Variant | TU102-875-A1 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Hopper |
| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process Size | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors | 18.6 billion | 80 billion |
| Die Size | 754 mm² | 814 mm² |
| Board Design | ||
| TDP | 260W | 700W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 1100 W |
| Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| Graphics Features | ||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 9.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | N/A |